CONTINUAL RESISTANCE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S BIGOTRY AND HIS ATTEMPT TO DESTROY ALL OF AMERICA'S FUNDAMENTAL DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES
It is by now clear that President Trump is a demagogic
leader having gained popular support in the primaries and the election by
appealing to wide ranging prejudices and also showing complete ignorance of the
consequences of his (generally vague) policy statements/positions. It is, at
least, just as obvious that President Trump relies primarily upon bullying and
threats to try to get what he wants.
One unmistakable
consequence of President Trump's bigotry and bullying is that the President is
modeling the acceptability of bigotry and demeaning behavior by his supporters- based on any and all of their prejudices. Bigotry and bullying are
“normalized” among the President's supporters (and for many of the young).
Another
implication of the contemptuous ways in which President Trump has publicly
exhibited his bigotry is to treat individuals and groups that he is prejudiced
towards as well as opponents and critics of his practices and policies etc. as
types of “objects” that are worthy of belittling with DEHUMANIZING words and,
by implication, DEHUMANIZING treatment. WIDESPREAD DEMEANING BEHAVIOR
UNDERMINES SOCIETAL UNITY AND THE FUNDAMENTALVALUE OF INCLUSIVENESS
AND RESPECT FOR ALL.
Furthermore,
fundamentally disrespectful treatment by those in positions of greater power,
in this case great power, has additional negative impacts upon the
individuals and groups that are targets of bigotry – socially damaging
(reducing opportunities, supportive resources etc.) and diminishing the power
of social action/agency.
Therefore, we must act together against this challenge
to the multiculturalism that is synonymous with the American Democratic ideal
around the world.
RESISTANCE
TO PRESIDENT'S TRUMP'S BIGOTRY MUST BE WIDELY BASED - AND CONTINUAL.
Since the end of the 19th century, the Republican
agenda has, first and foremost, been to
promote the economic interests of the very wealthy.
In the current 115th
Congress, the Republican agenda is,
unmistakably, indifferent to the well-being of the other 99+% of Americans.
The primary (economic) goal of the Trump
Administration and Republican Congress is to reduce the share of tax revenue
from the very wealthy and “their” large and powerful corporations. By a
standard measure of income inequality, America currently ranks 45th out of 144
nations – the change in the tax structure by the Trump administration and
Republican Congress will certainly markedly increase economic inequality in
America. In 2008, America ranked 28th among 33 developed nations for
children in poverty households. Likewise, America is an outlier for elderly
poverty and single parent families headed by females. We can expect
increased rates of poverty and reduced benefits available to the poor.
In
turn, such a change in the tax structure will be used to justify a reduction in
all areas of discretionary (as opposed to mandated by existing law) spending,
except military spending This will result in reductions in programs that
promote the well-being of the other 99+% of Americans. Starting with Reagan,
the Republican Party has used whatever leverage to reduce the effectiveness of
regulatory law passed TO PROTECT THE WELL-BEING OF THE 99+%. For example,
budgets have since been continually reduced for the FDA (overseeing the
healthfulness of food and drugs), OSHA (protecting employees in their
workplace) and the EPA (protecting harm to the environment – particularly that
promotes harm the 99+% from a “poisoned” environment).
Regulation TO PROTECT
THE WELL-BEING OF THE 99+% will be under never before imagined attack in order
TO INCREASE CORPORATE PROFITS.Reducing the active role of regulatory agencies
or weakening regulations will expose Americans to greater health risks (and
other risks) of all kinds – at work, as consumers, and through
air/water/food/medications, etc.
In
particular, gutting the protections of Obamacareand throwing enrollees into a
health insurance market that will be more expensive will leave many families
(as much as 30 million over time) without coverage or “healthcare poor". Thus,
making American health care even less effective than all other affluent nations
– in 2015, the U.S. ranked 31st of 195 nations in life expectancy, 38th out of
175 nations in infant mortality, etc. It is almost unimaginable that the
richest nation, with the highest material standard of living, stands alone
among affluent nations without a system of national, universal coverage healthcare
system (not based on affordability).
GREED IS THE EXPLANATION!#The Resistance is the antidote!
At stake is American democracy. Either we stand up in great numbers and in every way that we can or the likelihood of losing the heritage of democratic values is frighteningly real!
Demagogue: Does this sound like Trump? I think so.
Ademagogicleaderarisesduring someperiod of
perceived“crisis”andgainssubstantial populistsupportby appealing
to emotional passion by exploiting prejudice and ignoranceandnotbyofferingrationaldeliberation.Closedralliesof
supporters aretypical,avoidingbroaderpublic
participation.Demagoguestypicallyclaimapopularmandateinfaceof
clearcontradictoryevidence.
Demagogicleadersoftenrepeatlies/falsehoodsuntiltheyareacceptedas truebytheir
audiences.Theyalso
mayclaimcreditfor
things thattheydid
notdo. Freespeech,generally,andfree pressnorms,
inparticular,arenotupheld.Demagoguestypicallyattackcriticsor
mediathatdo
not agreewith them. WithStatepower, theyoftenpunishcriticswithvaryingdegreesof severity.
Demagoguesinademocraticsocietymaydiscreditmanyor
allaspects of the democratic processandstructure.Theymaymaypoliticizeor delegitimizean independentjudicialsystem.Political
oppositionmaybepunishedformallyor
informally.
They swim together in the white nationalist fever swamps. (by Jamelle Boule, Sept. 9, 2016, Slate)
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was booed by a crowd full of Baltimore Ravens fans after mentioning Tom Brady at his campaign rally in Maryland. Here are some other instances of Trump's awkward pandering.(Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post) "Like others I’ve discussed in “Demagogue: The Fight to Save Democracy from Its Worst Enemies,” Trump’s rise has been one of sheer hubris, overblown promises and an almost effortless seduction that can sweep up even the toughest critics. Consider the normally hard-nosed Republican pollster Frank Luntz, who reported “my legs are shaking” after talking Trump with focus group participants last August." (FromHere’s what demagogues like Trump do to their countries when they take powerby Michael Signer, February 29, 2016, The Washington Post)
At
stake is American democracy. Either we stand up in great numbers and in every way that we can or the likelihood of losing the heritage of democratic values is frighteningly real!
"After running a proto-fascist campaign, President-elect Donald Trump will bring his hate, misogyny, and bigotry to the White House at the end of the month. And when he does, NBC will have a machine ready to normalize him." (by John Whitehouse, Media Matters, January 4, 2017)
A uniquely
powerful key to Trump's elevation to the Presidency and the damage he will
do is the ability of the media to avoid the enabling role it
played during the primaries and the campaign. The media has to give the public
informed, critical substance on policy, not highlight every twitter remark as
if the media were reduced to tabloids. So long as the news organizations act primarily
as entertainment (to compete for viewer or reader ratings), the public will not
get the appropriate crucial coverage of, for example, global warming, nor the
appropriate analytical coverage of why the 99.99% have been losing ground (including
the implications of changes in the personal income laws favoring the wealthy or
changes in overall economy to a service economy or changes in technology
requiring fewer industrial production jobs).
No
question that consolidation in media ownership and sensitivity to advertiser
influence are part of the long term decline of a substantive, critical
journalism and a commitment to investigative journalism (meaning more than
“fact checking”). However, Trump has used his celebrity status and media
tabloid-like coverage to his advantage ($1.9 billion free media coverage) and,
even more significantly, he has used the uncritical reportage to
NORMALIZE HIS ILLIBERAL BEHAVIOR AND POLICY PROPOSALS.
"But when Trump lies, the Wall Street Journal—the second largest paper by circulation in the country—will not call it a lie, according to the its editor-in-chief Gerard Baker."
Outside
of the tabloids and highly partisan media, e.g. Hearst or Murdoch, journalists
have generally regarded their work as in the Jeffersonian public interest.
JOURNALISTS IN THAT TRADITION MUST STAND AGAINST uncritical reportage – they should be extremely wary of equal time on
two sides, (e.g. climate change), and they must debunk and contextualize
fake news, call out lies/false claims in the strongest possible terms!
Leonard Pitts, Jr.
"Baker’s is a mindset that has become all too common. With the obvious exception of certain partisan news outlets, some reporters, fearful of being tagged for “bias” on contentious issues, seek to safeguard themselves by ritually quoting a source from Side A and another from Side B while avoiding even painfully obvious conclusions. They call this “fair and balanced.” It’s actually gutless and dumb." Media Must Take A Moral Stand, by Leonard Pitts, Jr.,Miami Herald, January 4, 2017
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/leonard-pitts-jr/article124444124.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/leonard-pitts-jr/article124444124.html#storylink=cpy
We are
learning unwittingly how MEDIA CAN DESCEND INTO PROPAGANDA.
One key to resistance is
for the majority public to become
actively engaged in criticizing when media journalism fails its promise
for the majority public toSUPPORT
MEDIA JOURNALISM THAT RECLAIMS A STANDARD THAT CAN NOT NORMALIZE THE ILLIBERAL,
ANTI-DEMOCRATIC, PROTO-FASCIST ELEMENTS
OF THE NEW PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS
Backstory: Ever since Nixon's
appeal to the backlash against greater racial equality, the Republican Party,
the party of the wealthy/powerful elite, has increasingly appealed to hatred
and anger against racial minorities, women, and now more than any time since
the early 20th century, immigrants – and thereby has divided America more
and more, demolishing a center (e.g., Independents, ticket-splitting).
Starting
with Reagan, the Republican agenda to protect billionaires and the profit
of powerful corporations has become more obvious – for example, by reforming the tax code thereby putting more burden on the
bottom 99.99%, and attacking regulations (put in place to protect the lower 99.99%) by using
the wealthy propaganda myth of the “free market”.
To begin with, the Republicans captured the religious fundamentalist vote by flipping on cultural issues starting with a woman's right to an abortion (Reagan).
But the fundamentalist vote and the economically Conservative vote was not
enough in 2008.
As a result, the wealthy elite created the “virtual” Tea Party to build a
larger angry white constituency – angry about a feeling of economic
precariousness. And Americans should feel greater economic vulnerability – before the
G.W. Bush “Great Recession” starting in 2008, median family income had been stagnant for more than three decades (even with more family members working more jobs)and
job and retirement pension security was being progressively diminished for the
almost all workers.
The Here & Now:Trump is not only illiberal
but anti-democratic, questioning and challenging Constitutional constraints on the
Executive and chilling any criticism by individuals or by the media (i.e. the 1st
Amendment right to free speech) by veiled and not so veiled threats of violence
by his supporters or retaliation by himself (e.g. restricting the libel law).
Twentieth century Americans do know something about how speech was chilled
during the McCarthy era – Trump's threats during the primary campaign are
consistent with his on-going twitters etc. and threaten to chill speech in a
much more profound way - indeed, more similar to fascist regimes.
No surprise then that a lightning-rod-of-hate-and-anger demagogue like Trumpcould divide America as much as it was in the Civil War era. Trump's "MO" is:
spouting a message that he could bring all the (better paying?) jobs back
saying only he could fix things & “make America great again”
bring back traditional values
modeling illiberal behavior
unapologetically demeaning women
unapologetically demeaning ethnic, and national minorities
unapologetically demeaning any critics
But Trump is not only illiberal but anti-democratic, questioning/challenging Constitutional constraints on the Executive and chilling any criticism by individuals or by the media (i.e. the 1st Amendment right to free speech). His challenges are by veiled and not so veiled threats of violence by his supporters or retaliation by himself (e.g. restricting the libel law).
Twentieth century Americans do know something about how speech was chilled during the McCarthy era.Trump's threats during the primary campaign are consistent with his on-going, headline making tweets, etc., and threaten to chill speech in a much more profound way - indeed, more similar to fascist regimes.
The Republican Party and
its elite economic backbone have paved the way for Trump's demagogic appeal to
angry, hateful emotions(rejecting rational analysis entirely)and for his
illiberalism and anti-democratic inclinations.
WE ARE CONFRONTED WITH POSSIBLE AMERICAN FASCISM. WE MUST RESIST.
ANY WHO WANT A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY MUST RESIST.
ANY WHO WANT A LIBERAL CULTURE OF BROAD TOLERANCE AND RESPECT FOR ALL
REDUCING HARMV.WASTED TAX DOLLARS BY “DENIAL” POLITICIANS
Each passing day the Trump Administration (elect) makes it
clearer that their energy policies, strongly supported by the Republican Party,
will contributeto warming and rising seas, etc., rather than slowing warming and
all its harmful impacts.
Also, it appears certain that there will be proposed
Republican “infrastructure investment” legislation. However, since the
Republican Party rejects the settled science on global warming, the Republican
infrastructure legislation will be the
traditional “boondoggle” legislation: fixing unsafe bridges, repairing roads
etc.
Such
legislation would throw away our tax dollars on construction investments (and other investments) that are out of date or will shortly be out of date in a world that is
continuously warming and climate is, therefore, continuously changing. Accordingly,
the Democratic Senatorial minority must use the filibuster to prevent the
waste of our tax dollars and make clear in Democratic legislative proposals
that reducing harm to the American people is the first test of new
infrastructure legislation.
By WORKING WITH OTHER COMMUNITIES AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, we will help plan changes to best PROTECT our communities AND WE WILL
ENCOURAGE & SUPPORT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:
RESISTANCE TO WORTHLESS
INFRASTRUCTURE LEGISLATION
EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ON TRULY WORTHWHILE
INFRASTRUCTURE CHANGES IN A WARMING WORLD
A first step is to contact city government and ask them about plans for infrastructure that help protect against and withstand severe weather events.
Be an activist! #resist all global warming denial!
Global warming is publicly treated by many GOP leaders as a hoax or as only a minor issue of concern!
The new Republican Administration has made it clear that it:
will not pursue policies to slow global warming
will seek to REVERSE EXISTING POLICIES that would reduce warming gas emissions
will not PURSUE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES to protect us from the ravages of continued warming and increasingly harmful climatic changes
Hurricane Sandy - Rockaway damage
Even though it is obvious to coastal communities around the world that sea level IS rising and threatening lives and the existence of entire communities - there will be MINIMAL ad-hoc support from the Republican administration to help those communities prepare for the warming future.Localities are on their own as far as planning for infrastructural changes required in a "warming" world.
Therefore, WORKING WITH OTHER COMMUNITIES at the grass-rootslevel, we will help plan infrastructural changes to best protect our lives and our quality of life in a "warming" world.